Halo: Combat Evolved

Halo: Combat Evolved
4
Game Name: Halo: Combat Evolved
Platforms: Windows 98
Publisher(s): Microsoft Games Studios
Developer(s): Bungie Studios (port by Gearbox)
Genre(s): First Person Shooter
Release Date: Sep, 2003
Notes: Looks like second hand

You’ll have to forgive me for being caught totally unprepared – I didn’t realize last month was the original Xbox’s ten year anniversary. Since Halo was a launch title, the same is true for the game as well… as all sorts of retrospectives and excited forum posts have readily reminded me. I’m not quite ready to add an Xbox section to the site yet, but I figured the least I could do is drop some words down for the overlooked, two-year-late PC port of a game that helped define the console first person shooter.

Farting around in the vehicles was always fun. Period.

Many players cite Halo as their introduction to the FPS genre – a concept which makes plenty of PC die hards gnash their teeth in frustration. But to be fair, it’s really not a bad entry. While the Xbox version (along with GoldenEye on the N64) proved the ability to do an FPS on a console, the game itself also made notable contributions to the genre – and no, not just with the overused recharging health system and two gun limit seen in every modern shooter. Let’s also be honest, launching alongside the Xbox gave it notoriety it otherwise would have missed.  If Halo had stayed on the Mac, it would be a cult favorite, but otherwise obscure.

This first title, before prequels and sequels really fleshed out its universe, is cliched sci-fi. Humanity is at war with a technologically-superior alien empire known as The Covenant. After a crippling defeat, the human frigate Pillar of Autumn makes a blind hyperspace jump and ends up around a mysterious mechanical ring with an Earth-like atmosphere. The decision is made to thaw you out – the helmeted, jade-armored super soldier known only as the Master Chief – and try to race the pursuing Covenant forces to discovering the purpose of Halo. There’s not much depth here (yet), and it does awkwardly try to mimic moments from Aliens and Starship Troopers, but the plot generally keeps you interested. There’s also a pretty decent twist that’s surprising and executed well. The plot’s not as clever or cerebral as Bungie’s previous work, but it’s certainly more accessible.

Hands down, it’s the depth of the combat that makes this game. It’s as accessible as any other FPS (aim, shoot), but supported with many small nuances that, at higher difficulty levels, force players to think about each engagement. First and foremost is your own energy shield. It will absorb a few hits, but then recharge if you stay behind cover. When your shield is down, your precious health starts taking the hits – and that can only be replenished through limited medic kits found in the levels. Right away, you’re encouraged to be cautious in your approach, but also aren’t left completely without options if things go poorly.

Elites dodge many of your initial attacks.

From there, you have various enemy types to consider, each with different advantages and disadvantages. The impish Grunts offer comic relief and cannon fodder, but can still be dangerous in groups or at the end of tight hallways. Jackals carry energy shields, but can handily be sniped from afar, or overwhelmed with a combo of sustained fire and a melee strike. Elites have heavy weapons and the same energy shields as you, forcing you to think about how to approach them. If they get to cover, their shields will regenerate and your attacks up to that point will be for naught. Chase them, though, and they stand a good chance of putting you down as you round the corner.

The AI supports these differences brilliantly, and got much praise for it. It goes beyond tactics and teamwork (a la Half-Life) and into really making each alien type its own character. The AI knows its own role and that alien’s limitations – it knows when to retreat and when to press an attack. Many a time the AI knew I was weakened and correctly rushed my cover to knock me out before my shields recharged. The AI can be caught unaware and hit with a surprise attack (such as a sticky plasma grenade), but also responds to gunfire and the shouts of other aliens. They have great situational awareness without psychically knowing where you are – they’ll shoot through windows to hit you, or wait at the corner you disappeared around, rather than blindly following you. They’re a tough, maddeningly patient, and worthy opponent – and extremely hard to trick or exploit (which, admittedly, is half of beating any FPS at the highest difficulty).

The nuances don’t end there. Human weapons can be reloaded, but Covenant weapons (in the plot, still a mystery to scientists) can only be dropped or replaced when their charge runs out. Low level grunts shout their states (“Coming!”  “He’s here!”) and panic easily when their leaders are killed. Elites, however, are quiet, stealthy and communicate in alien gibberish so you don’t know their next move. Covenant weapons are great at dropping shields, while human guns nicely shred armor or alien hides. An advanced tactic involves nuking shields with a Covenant gun and finishing them off with a bullet weapon. This is also the game where the toughest brutes can be killed in one shot with a pistol, simply by knowing where and when to hit them. There really is a lot of depth to the mechanics, and a lot to discover.

This room. Forever.

Which brings us to the complaints you’ve surely heard before – level design and the Flood. Saying that sections of Halo are some of the worst-designed levels in modern FPS history is not hyperbole. “Assault on the Control Room” and the infamous “Library” feature levels literally made up of copy/pasted rooms. These levels are terrible, monotonous, and tedious to the extreme. They are only made manageable through the thoughtful combat. Each level becomes something like a challenge room, with a different twist through enemy makeup, pillar placement, or available weapons. Even that stretches out far past its welcome, and navigating these rooms is both confusing and dreary. It’s like Bungie learned nothing about level design and decoration since Marathon.

As for the Flood, they are a parasitic race introduced about halfway into the story. They take all of the amazing advancements to AI and combat and pitch them right into in the bin. The Flood reanimates dead soldiers and sends them sprinting right at you, flailing appendages or spastically firing weapons. It brings all the joy of running backward whilst firing your gun back into an FPS that didn’t remotely need it. Perhaps the intent was to bring in some “classic” gameplay as a break from all the tactics, but these engagements sit somewhere between “a waste of time” and “a pain in the ass.” The Flood is crucial to the story, so Bungie painted themselves a bit into a corner, but it’s telling that they appear less frequently in the sequels.

While every level is padded out by some bland corridors and blatantly repeated rooms, only a few use these as the majority of the map. Most levels have unique rooms or centerpieces (like the hangar bay on the alien cruiser), or gorgeous outdoor areas and structures between more generic hallways. There’s no slouching here, and the outdoor areas are all lovingly crafted highlights. There are installations built up in icy cliffs, sunny beaches to storm, hills with defensive emplacements, foggy jungles, and a mountain path to assault at night. Levels are all fairly linear, but these outdoor sections are wide and expansive, with plenty of opportunities to hop into a nimble Warthog four-wheeler, or tear apart enemy positions in the beastly tank. All vehicles are satisfying to drive, and integrated into the game well (that ending!).

At least there’s plenty of shiny textures and sparkly particles.

Which brings us specifically to the PC port. Gameplay between the two versions is identical (including checkpoints, but no quicksaves and no sprint option), with a possible edge given to mouse and keyboard controls. Graphics, unfortunately, are pretty identical as well. The console’s lower resolution textures don’t look too impressive blown up to 1280×1024, and no attempt seems to have been made to tweak them for the PC release. Flat textures, very limited bump mapping, and a ridiculous amount of jaggies (with no AA option !?) seem to suggest that Bungie made their assets to the limitations of the Xbox, with no consideration of future ports. Fair enough, I suppose, but the bane of a good PC port. At least the audio and orchestral soundtrack still sounds excellent, and all weapons are particularly punchy.

The other PC feature is online multiplayer. Halo became pretty much the console multiplayer experience, both in campaign co-op and LAN-based deathmatch/flag capture arenas. However, it was all local – good for university dorms, bad for everyone else. The PC port brought the action online, and in line with other options on the platform. However, Half-Life was just too well-established for this to make much of a difference, and that’s before we consider dismissive PC snobbery. This is mostly a historical point though, as I have no expectations anyone will be playing this online today.

If you’re a fan of first person shooters, Halo is certainly worth a play. If you have no other options, the PC version of Halo is tolerably worth a play. Keep in mind that this port is essentially just emulating the console experience (perhaps on purpose?), and certainly won’t hold up to PC FPS stalwarts. Don’t expect it to have the visual quality, or even the standard features (again, quicksaves) of its PC competition. Still, that AI is sharp, combat requires some real thought, and you’re in for a satisfying challenge at harder difficulty levels.

 

The Good

Smart AI, nuanced mechanics, and a two weapon limit really does… dare I say… evolve combat. The PC port matches the gameplay introduced on the consoles, and it’s still a challenging fight if you set the difficulty high enough.

The Bad

The PC port looks a little too similar to the console original. No bump in graphical fidelity for playing it on the PC. No improvements like quicksaves. Online multiplayer was a nice exclusive, but irrelevant now. Features sections of truly uninspired, blatantly cloned levels that artificially pad them out.

 

Men, here is where we show those split-chin squid-headed sons-of-bitches that they could not have picked a worse enemy than the human race!  We are going to blow the hell out of those dumb bugs until we don’t have anything left to shoot ‘em with!  And then we are going to strangle them with their own living guts!   — Sgt. Avery Johnson

 

3 Comments

  1. Rik says:

    Nice to have some sober analysis of this game; like Call of Duty et al it’s something I previously knew nothing about except that the Xbox kids talk about it in hushed tones all the time.

    Was flipping through an old PC mag the other day and it reminded me that this was going to be a PC game first, before anyone even knew what an Xbox was…

  2. The J Man says:

    Halo was definitely just another game to me, but it’s also easy to forget that PCs, even a crappy hand-me-down like I had, actually weren’t that common as dedicated gaming boxes around 2000. Usually it was one shared family computer, and not cheap enough to get one for the kids to bang around on. It makes sense that a $200 console would be a majority’s first experience for LAN games and such. And if that’s the case, I can completely see how they would hold Halo with the same reverence that I hold Doom.

    I do have a good Halo multiplayer story though.

    My roommate invited me to a match with two of his Halo friends. They had an elaborate system link setup across two rooms, so each team had their own room. We started with Capture the Flag on a map with two bases on either side of a narrow valley, with open land between them.

    Each base started with an ATV nearby. The idea was to use the vehicle to race to and from the enemy base. You couldn’t destroy vehicles, but you could flip them over, and it took a few seconds for someone to right it before they could drive.

    I had a rocket launcher and view of the enemy vehicle. My plan was to flip it so that we could get a few seconds to snipe them as they tried to flip it back over. To this end, I fired a rocket at the stationary ATV from across the map.

    “Don’t waste rockets” says my roommate. I’d beaten the game, but hadn’t played multiplayer before, so he had been coaching me all the way down.

    Deciding it would take too long to explain my plan, I simply respond “I didn’t.”

    About two seconds later, the enemy team bombs out of their base and clambers aboard the ATV. They were too late to start it moving, but just in time for that rocket I fired about five seconds ago to smash into the car, killing them both instantly.

    My roommate turns to me with his jaw on the floor like I was fucking psychic. I had no idea that would happen, but hey – why waste a good moment? – so I just smile knowingly and go back to the game. He stopped giving advice for the rest of the night.

  3. Rik says:

    I have zero FPS multiplayer experience. So I guess no FPS holds a particular place in my heart as I never really played one beyond the limits of a single-player campaign.

    Doubtless I’d be useless at any FPS that required me to use a joypad – someone invited me to a game of Gears of War and I was staggering around aimlessly, shooting walls and failing to get through doors. The other guy looked at me with a mixture of astonishment and pity – as if it was his grandfather at the controls.

    I do agree though, from my experience with other genres, that multiplayer is where real fondness for lots of games is often forged.

Leave a Comment